Skip to main content

Originally Posted by ammo:

We didn't milk cows on our farm when i was a kid antiworst but I had a lot of friends who felt the pain of those Surge milker staps.  They still talk about it 45 years later. 


So do I. As you can tell, it left a "lasting" impression. And not in a good way. My Ol' Man didn't even drink. He was just a mean SOB. I have a special sensitivity to child abusers...again...not in a good way.

Originally Posted by Pack-Man:
Originally Posted by Snorton:

I got a few whoopings growing up, needed them.

 

I believe in spanking, although I believe that's a choice that I respect either way.  I have a 5 year old, currently a 'spanking' is a swat on the butt with a severe frown and an age appropriate explanation of why being naughty is wrong.

 

Anyone that thinks using a switch on a 4 year old child for any reason is a rational thing to do doesn't deserve the gift of being a father.

I got the switch and the belt, never made me bleed or left any lingering marks, though. AP really must have wailed on the kid.


I get what you're saying, but I still think that what's being lost in fond reminiscence here is whether it's 1950 or 2014, a decent human being doesn't punish a toddler with a gotdamn whip.

I don't know how you take an alpha male like AP who probably thinks being beaten was beneficial to the development of his character and get him to see there are ideas worth exploring beyond violence and aggression.   


The entire media is in a manic gossiping frenzy, frolicking in righteous indignation and infatuated with every lurid detail about the violence and yet it's a teachable moment that's quickly passing by without any teaching.  Every media host falls in line with contempt and a serious tone, but there's no mention of solutions and there are plenty worth discussing.  I've heard, watched, or read nothing on alternative techniques to dealing with anger and violence.

 

It's a complex topic but if the NFL, the networks. and advertising agencies can get together and manipulate the unwashed masses into thinking pisswater like Coors Lite is not only drinkable but also worth paying for, then they sure as the sun can figure out a way to influence our NFL crazed nation to resolve conflict in a more benevolent manner. It's not even that hard. It just takes effort. 

 

Emotions more or less begin inside two almond-shaped structures in our brains which are called the amygdala. The amygdala is the part of the brain responsible for identifying threats to our well-being, and for sending out an alarm when threats are identified that results in us taking steps to protect ourselves. The amygdala is so efficient at warning us about threats, that it gets us reacting before the cortex (the part of the brain responsible for thought and judgment) is able to check on the reasonableness of our reaction.

 

As you become angry your body's muscles tense up. Inside your brain, neurotransmitter chemicals known as catecholamines are released causing you to experience a burst of energy lasting up to several minutes. This burst of energy is behind the common angry desire to take immediate protective action. At the same time your heart rate accelerates, your blood pressure rises, and your rate of breathing increases. Your face may flush as increased blood flow enters your limbs and extremities in preparation for physical action. Your attention narrows and becomes locked onto the target of your anger. Soon you can pay attention to nothing else. In quick succession, additional brain neurotransmitters and hormones (among them adrenaline and noradrenaline) are released which trigger a lasting state of arousal. You're now ready to fight. -physiology of anger

 

Think about that going on inside the body of Adrian f'ing Peterson and then think about what that 4 year old was thinking as all that was going on and all of it was focused square on him. Sounds to me like AP beat the kid head to foot.  Grown men marvel at AP's legendary handshake.  I've heard it multiple times.       

 

If the NFL is going to encourage the creation of physical monsters it needs to own up to it's responsibility to provide every resource they can muster to teach these men techniques on how not to use their literally superhuman powers on their children and their wives.  The resources are there. The information is there.  The effort is no where to be found and it's unconscionable.       /rant

I don't understand why these players can't control themselves. Adrian is a world class athlete, it's not the same when he hits his kid with a switch as when his daddy hit him with a switch. Adrian's daddy also knew when enough was enough as far as discipline goes...maybe he didn't and that's why Adrian is in this mess. Hitting his kid with a switch may be a family and cultural tradition, but beating him to the extent he did is not.

If those tmz pics are accurate...this is worse than the ray rice incident!

  I don't need to understand the physiology of anger, or sympathize with ap's upbringing To understand the difference between a spanking and a beating. 

Unlike the ray rice incident....this 4year old...wasn't drunk, weighs probably 40 pounds, has no ability to leave the home, and utterly defenseless. 

If Peterson is not subject to a similar punishment as rice...I guess we know how society feels about legit child abuse. And I don't give a rats a$$ about any football implications.  

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

Read the police report. Deleted my earlier post. 

 

AP being a daddy the way his daddy taught him. It's been mentioned. I'm sure more than a few of us took a whipping as kids. Maybe more than a few. I figured out you can have discipline without being physical. Seatbelts were optional when I was a kid too. We're a little better informed now. 

 

Regarding AP. That wasn't discipline. That was child abuse. The police report is sickening. AP texted he  wants his kids to know daddy don't play when it comes to acting right. 

 

4 year old knows daddy don't play alright. What a POS. 

there's also quite a difference between a few swats on the butt to welts on the extremities nod other areas. 

for the Gravediggers of the world, I will go ahead and offer a definition of discipline vs punishment.  Discipline is about learning, it indicates what you need to do in the future to do better.  Discipline is logical and connects the consequence to the infraction.  When using discipline, the individual may or may not feel discomfort, but that is all on the shoulders of the person being disciplined.  Discipline is not effective unless it is about "making it right." Punishment is about an inferior/superior relationship.  The punisher does not feel the punishment is complete until the individual has felt enough pain.  It is not about learning, does not indicate what you need to in the future and does not leave the punished any more prepared to do better in the future.  Punishment is about power, discipline is about teaching.  Discipline is about making you better, punishment is about making you smaller.   

Originally Posted by Herschel:
Originally Posted by Hungry5:

Wow.

 

I'm probably going to lose my fantasy football matchup this week cause all day can't play Sunday for disciplining his child Jesus help us
 
 
 

Maybe I'm wrong but I read that as sarcasm and a dig at people who care more about their ff team than people who are hurt.

That was my first impression when I read it. Sarcasm isn't always properly conveyed over the internet.

 

 

Originally Posted by DurangoDoug:

From PFT:

 

"Nick Wright of 610-AM in Houston reports that Peterson told police he gave his son a “whooping” in a May incident in Spring, Texas. According to the report, Peterson said he did it to punish the child for pushing another one of Peterson’s children while they were playing a video game. The report says Peterson grabbed a tree branch, removed the leaves and struck the 4-year-old repeatedly.

The child’s injuries reportedly included cuts and bruises to the child’s back, buttocks, ankles, legs and scrotum, along with defensive wounds to the child’s hands. According to the report, Peterson texted the boy’s mother and acknowledged what he had done and that she would be “mad at me about his leg. I got kinda good wit the tail end of the switch.”

 

Linky

 

If true its really, I mean really, really sad. A bit of not too harsh corporal puunishment is one thing but to beat a poor innocent kid like this takes a special kind of evil.

There was a lot of rage involved in that beating. His whole body is covered in welts. Can I hear more stupid comments about time outs?

I just liked an IC post, I think I need a shower, ;-)

 

well said, IC.

 

i just had a "conversation" with a friend who blames the media for Peterson's predicament, after all, he was just "disciplining his child". Apparently a scrotum tear is the acceptable punishment for a four-year-old. It's not unexpected but sad that many people defend scumbags just for the uniform they wear.

Why can't the players control themselves?  Part of the problem is that the system has enabled and coddled this type of behavior.  Professional athletes also have the resources to defend claims. 

We need to also remember this isn't flag football.   It is a very violent sport and it's celebrated!!  Then they leave the field of play and can't adjust to social norms accordingly. 

I could also get into the upbringing  aspect but this isn't a black or white issue.  It's a system issue.   Until the NFL takes a zero tolerance stand on criminal behavior and educates it's teams and owners and players this will continue to happen. 

The only surprise to me is that people are surprised at the Greg Hardy's and Ray Rice's of the world.   It's not some new phenomenon
Originally Posted by Goalline:Linky

 

If true its really, I mean really, really sad. A bit of not too harsh corporal puunishment is one thing but to beat a poor innocent kid like this takes a special kind of evil.

There was a lot of rage involved in that beating. His whole body is covered in welts. Can I hear more stupid comments about time outs?

No, plenty of these cases are overblown.  This one isn't.

At the very least AP is truly ignorant.

Last edited by Pistol GB
Originally Posted by El-Ka-Bong:

       

for the Gravediggers of the world, I will go ahead and offer a definition of discipline vs punishment.  Discipline is about learning, it indicates what you need to do in the future to do better.  Discipline is logical and connects the consequence to the infraction.  When using discipline, the individual may or may not feel discomfort, but that is all on the shoulders of the person being disciplined.  Discipline is not effective unless it is about "making it right." Punishment is about an inferior/superior relationship.  The punisher does not feel the punishment is complete until the individual has felt enough pain.  It is not about learning, does not indicate what you need to in the future and does not leave the punished any more prepared to do better in the future.  Punishment is about power, discipline is about teaching.  Discipline is about making you better, punishment is about making you smaller.   


       


Thanks for offering that definition. Not sure why the Gravediggers of the world needed it? I didn't condone this behavior.
Originally Posted by Henry:
Originally Posted by titmfatied:

The look of a guy who feels he's done absolutely nothing wrong:

 

 

 

PR machine ramping up.  Smile for your mugshot.

I don't know, he tells the mom, "You might be mad at me for his legs," like he forgot to take out the trash or spilled Pepsi on the rug or something.

Last edited by Pistol GB

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×