Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Floridarob:

Ted has plenty of options next year. TE, WR, OL, DL, LB, and safety. Not sure what position is most needed. If Capers gets canned and they go back to a 4-3 a DE and LB will be must and with Finly being done a TE is a definete need. Safety is also top of the list and if Jones bolts, another WR will be needed.  Geez, Ted will have a lot of work next draft.

 

If they go back to a 4-3 they'd probably be okay at two linebackers and DE. Matthews can play OLB in a 4-3, Perry and Jones can line up at DE. They'd probably run a 4-3 similar to Seattle or Denver which uses some 3-4 principles.

Floridarob if you are talk next year draft as it stands now OL will not be high on Ted list.

I suspect the top two positions the Packers will target are TE and Safety. I think at those spots any high pick will probably will be starters in 2014. WR is another possible target of Ted since that position seems to take a year or for the player to learn the Packers system. 

Of course as in the past Ted will take advantage of players falling in the draft.

http://www.espnwisconsin.com/c...=11261&is_corp=1

 

Matt Flynn’s re-welcoming committee consisted of two semi-nude, affectionate fat guys.

Oh, there were plenty of other former – and now, current again – teammates who were happy to see him back at Lambeau Field. But none as, uh, demonstrative as offensive linemen T.J. Lang and Josh Sitton.

β€œWhen I first walked in, T.J. and Sitton were in the hot tub, and they tried to throw me in,” the once and now again Green Bay Packers backup quarterback said Wednesday. β€œThey were both almost naked and giving me hugs soaking wet (when) I was in my clothes.

β€œJerks.”

If the rest of the NFL is done with Flynn...keep him here for the rest of Rodgers' tenure...and I know this is probably not in the TT playbook, but pay more than vet minimum for a good vet backup like Flynn.

 

In all honesty, this is probably moot. If Flynn plays like he did today during the rest of Rodgers' absence, someone will give him another shot at a starting gig. He really is the perfect backup to Rodgers though.

Originally Posted by packerboi:

Nope. He also didn't look like a deer in the headlights either. He starts and we win that game.

 

That's all on MM. Why wasn't he starting not just this week but since he got here?

 

Arm looked fine. He was confident. That looked like our offense.

 

 

I'll go back even further than that.  Why didn't they sign him when the Raiders dropped him?  Heck, at least give him a workout.  Did they really think Seneca was going to do anything pawsitive if called upon?  They may have actually won 1 of the last 4 games had he been signed earlier in the season.

Let's be honest.  Before today, Tolzien looked like the perfect developmental QB.  He made all his deep throws last week, and looked poised for the most part.  He made a few bad decisions, but put the ball where it needed to be on most plays.

 

Today, the receivers made some "out of this world" catches, or Tolzien's numbers would have been even worse.  He was so out of sync today, it was painful to watch.  Also, Rhodes did make some spectacular plays for the Vikings.

 

That said, in hi post-game presser, McCarthy said he wouldn't announce a starter for Thursday.  If Rodgers isn't playing, it better be Flynn or I could see mutiny and mass rioting occurring.

Originally Posted by Pack-Man:

No way in hell Flynn does not start in Detroit. Mike is just playing a game, trying to make it look like there's some chance Rodgers will play. The only way Tolzien gets the start is if Flynn is injured now or in practice this week. Guy is just terrible.

Flynn did take a hell of a shot in OT but seemed OK. It's definitely Flynn or Rodgers Thursday. If it is Flynn, I'd dress Rodgers as the #2 unless he's definitely not ready.

 

Was disappointed when I saw Flynn coming out of the tunnel at halftime with his stocking cap on. Figured that was when MM would make the change. Then when we saw him getting loose on the sideline in the 3rd quarter the crowd started buzzing. Got a nice ovation when he entered the game.

 

Let him start the 2nd half and we might be tied for 1st place right now.

I think alot of people think that MM will make any QB better.  That may/may not be the case.  I was disappointed in how Tolzein played, I thought he would continue to improve, that didn't happen.  I thought he played pretty good, all things considered, against the NYG.  Who would have thought he would have looked so bad at home against the Queens.  

 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×