Skip to main content

About 15 minutes ago I saw what I thought was a 10 minute segment about the Packers on NFL Network.  But they didn't do their homework.  They think that "Randall, who only played S in college is projected to be the starting CB in Tramon Williams place".  NOT TRUE.  Randall is not the projected starter.  Last I heard Casey Hayward is the "projected" starter.  Also, Randall was a CB in college.  He played S his Senior year because it was best for his team.  I knew that before the draft.  So there were words about how difficult a transition Randall would have to make, etc.  But oddly enough no mention about the DL issues, or about how TE might be an issue.  Lots of praise for the offense - but made it sound like Bulaga was signed from another team in FA.  Lots of talk about getting back to a SB. 

Let's talk wide receivers.   I look into my crystal ball and see these guys playing:

 

Jordy, Cobb, Adams, Monty, Myles White.

 

I was hoping Abbrederis would make the team, but I'm starting to doubt he can take the hits and stay on the field.   Hearing that Jordy has had high praise for Larry Pinkard makes me wonder about him, as well.

 

What do you guys think?   And do you see us with 5 WR's, or possibly 6?

After β€ͺ#β€ŽPackers‬ veteran Casey Hayward, who will most likely line-up alongside Sam Shields at cornerback for the 2015 Packers? #23 1st round pick Damarious Randall has the best overall technique, agility, but can be fooled as he moves from safety to corner. #36 LaDarius Gunter is the 6-2" undrafted free agent from Miami who has great instinct, made the most "splash" plays by far in camp, but may be guilty of a lot of holding, grabbing, PI. #24 2nd round pick Quinten Rollins has impressed the coaches with his questions, study habits, and skill, but got a late start in camp due to a hamstring. #39 Demetri Goodson, to me, has shown very little progress following his inactive rookie season, and the most likely to be released. This could all change Thursday night in New England - MIKE CLEMENS

Originally Posted by YATittle:

       
Good story on two UDFA linebackers. GD, do you think they stick based on what you saw in camp?

http://www.jsonline.com/sports...907z1-321518211.html


       


I do. Both Rasco and Vaughters have impressed in the times that I've seen them in practice.  Thinking both of them should earn spots on this roster.

As for Carl Bradford, I watched him play for ASU for years. He was incredible, and I believe he is far better than he's gotten a chance to show. Hopefully, he can turn it around in the preseason games and prove he belongs.
Last edited by Trophies
What I saw from both those guys is that they need time to develop. They seemed like rookies who were lagging a little behind. That's not to say they were bad, but they seemed overwhelmed and a step behind everyone else. Keep in mind I saw them for 4 of the first 5 practices so take that with a grain of salt. They both look like they belong physically. Vaughters is a little shorter, but Rasco has good size.

They're also in a crowded OLB field. They only kept 6 or 7 OLBs on the roster last year and we didn't lose anyone. They moved Palmer to ILB, but we're still looking at CM, Peppers, Neal, Perry, Elliot, Mulumba right now plus a guy like Hubbard who has improved and is waiting in the wings. It's a numbers game, so if these guys stick it will have to be on IR or the PS.
Originally Posted by Trophies:

I do. Both Rasco and Vaughters have impressed in the times that I've seen them in practice.  Thinking both of them should earn spots on this roster.


So, who do you drop to keep Rasco and Vaughters ? Usually they keep 6 or 7 OLB's on the final roster. So if you keep them you have to drop two of the following :  Clay, Peppers, Neal, Perry, Elliot, Mulumba, or Hubbard. Looking forward to seeing if one or both can displace Mulumba, Elliot, or Hubbard. 

I agree with Grave Digger's assessment in that they are indeed rookies, and are a touch underdeveloped, and you can see them thinking, a lot. However, I find them to be a bit more impressive and effective in spite of that. Rasco does have good size to step right in. Vaughters is a bit smaller, but he certainly brings it.

 

I see Perry out. I will be shocked if he makes this 2015 team. That leave one fighting with Hubbard, Neal, Mulumba and Elliott for a spot on the roster. My thinking is both win positions with probably Perry and Mulumba out. Maybe Neal if he fails to show in preseason. It is possible Neal buys the PUP. Tough cuts, no doubt. To me, Vaughters' STs resume is a trump card.

 

This is just my speculation. No one knows right now. Good depth is a good problem to have, and I believe we have good depth there.

 

OLB, ILB and CB are our biggest battles, without question.

 

I agree with GD on Gaston too. I think he will win a roster spot, maybe at the expense of Thornton and/or Boyd. Hoping for great things from Ringo too.

Last edited by Trophies
Originally Posted by YATittle:

Good story on two UDFA linebackers. GD, do you think they stick based on what you saw in camp?

 

http://www.jsonline.com/sports...907z1-321518211.html

 

Sounds like Peppers will pick his spots even more this season, I'm not sure how it might impact the roster numbers.

 

-----

Julius Peppers has been known to take plays off here and there. Now, the Green Bay Packers are considering just removing him from the field on occasion.

It’s the less is more theory.

Peppers is 35 and although he still played at a high level in 2014, he’s certainly no spring chicken. The coaching staff may limit Peppers’ snaps in order to keep him fresh, with an eye on him making an impact at crucial points within the game and, more importantly, late in the season and in the playoffs.

Julie seems to be buying into the idea.

β€œIt’s a tough call,” he said. β€œAs a player, I don’t want to come off the field. But obviously, when I’m out there and if I’m playing less and I could save a little energy certain times of the game, maybe I could be more productive and more efficient in those situations.

β€œWe just have to figure it out. We’ll figure something out and hopefully it will work.”

 

http://totalpackers.com/2015/0...julius-peppers-less/

Originally Posted by RoyalWulff:

Yeah, saw the piece today.   It was not impressive.  It seemed to me that it was nothing but a piece on the Super Bowl potential of this team.  No news there.

 

There was no live footage of practice.  But I sure see lots of camera time in Dallas, Cleveland, etc.

That's because there's something interesting going on there, from a casual, national perspective. In Green Bay there's maybe a little intrigue at ILB and possibly at CB, but QB, RB, and WR are set. Dallas has questions at RB and #2 wideout, Cleveland has Johnny Rehab and questions all over the place.

I actually really like the way Perry has played when healthy. If they're gambling on a player, it's going to on a healthy Perry...not on 1 or 2 rookie UDFA's. Just my opinion. There hasn't been anything they have done that has been better than Perry except stay healthy. That could change after preseason games, but I just can't see it. They haven't been as impressive as Jayrone Elliot was last year as a rookie UDFA. As I said before camp started, this roster is pretty much set except for a few backup spots.

Myles White vs. Jeff Janis is going to be the hardest decision on the team. Ultimately I think either they keep both or Janis wins. Hate to see a guy like White gone, he's a talented player.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×