You’re thinking of Glen Fry.
@Blair Kiel posted:You’re thinking of Glen Fry.
Isn't that a baby fish?
@Blair Kiel posted:You’re thinking of Glen Fry.
I was thinking Cybill Shepherd.
@bdplant posted:What happened to Terry Glenn?
Still dead five years later.
@PackerHawk posted:Still dead five years later.
I just looked it up and now I get it. It was on AOL the other day and I guess it was just clickbait. It was hook,line and sinker for me ha ha. I did not realize it was five years ago. Why would they do that like that. I forgive you guys I deserved it all. Ha Ha Ha. Come on ,I can take it . 
I googled it. R.I.P. Terry Glenn
Time to switch to Netscape
Back on subject : Boy that Watson is sure a sight to watch. I hope he can keep it up. Woudn't that be something else. 
@The Grinder posted:I just looked it up and now I get it. It was on AOL the other day
If it doesn't come from Ask Jeeves I don't believe it.
You’ll get your information much faster if you update to a 56k modem.
I remember back in the dark days before broadband doing "multilink" and using two phone lines for a insane 112K connection.
In reality the only insane thing was thinking I was actually getting 112K. It was more like 70-80K.
I could last longer watching dial up porn.
An obscene stat...
Watson currently leads the league in TD to Targets ratio...
He scores a TD every 5.85 times he's thrown to.
Next closest is Travis Kelce with TD every 9.75 targets.
Third best is AJ Brown with 10.2
Imagine a really good slot WR paired with him or a real TE (a young Jarred Cook/JerMichael Finley) type. This offense would turn around in a hurry, even with Jordan Love at the helm.
@packerboi posted:Imagine a really good slot WR paired with him or a real TE (a young Jarred Cook/JerMichael Finley) type. This offense would turn around in a hurry, even with Jordan Love at the helm.
We have a dynamite slot at Fresno State this year who is going to be drafted...Nikko Remigio...was a starter at Cal, but wanted to be more of a feature guy so transferred here.
Housed a couple punts for us, damn near a couple more and kickoffs too. He is undersized (brother is half Filipino, what's he gonna do?) 5'9.5" 180, but the dude is built like a brick house. Not saying burn a 1st or 2nd rounder on him, but if he's there in R4-R5 we'd be wise to get him. He does it all...slot stuff, jet sweep, KR/PR...definitely young Cobb vibes.
But unfortunately Gurt has "size requirements" he isn't particularly flexible on.
If you're going to be small, you gotta have speed.
My college bio read, “He’s small, but he’s slow.”
@DH13 posted:If you're going to be small, you gotta have speed.
My wife agrees.
From Bill Huber, showing how much Rodgers doesn't trust/trusts his young WRs:
"From 2008 through 2021, the first 14 seasons of Aaron Rodgers’ run as the starting quarterback, the #Packers got 13 touchdown receptions from their rookie receivers. Watson (seven), Doubs (three) and Toure (one) have 11."
This year Rodgers has no choice but to use the young guys because Watkins does nothing more than use oxygen on the field; Cobb has been hurt; Lazard has been only okay and is not a #1 or #2; Tonyan...hard to tell if his number hasn't been called much or he isn't open. Jones has been reliable, but he's still an RB. If Watson hadn't come on, this offense might as well be three yards and a cloud of turf.
@packerboi posted:Imagine a really good slot WR paired with him or a real TE (a young Jarred Cook/JerMichael Finley) type. This offense would turn around in a hurry, even with Jordan Love at the helm.
With the solidification off the o-line and the deep threat of Watson finally healthy, the current offense has averaged 27 pts in the last 4 games .... I would think that they are "turned around" right now?
Tonyan should have requested a faster acl.
@Chongo posted:We have a dynamite slot at Fresno State this year who is going to be drafted...Nikko Remigio...was a starter at Cal, but wanted to be more of a feature guy so transferred here.
Housed a couple punts for us, damn near a couple more and kickoffs too. He is undersized (brother is half Filipino, what's he gonna do?) 5'9.5" 180, but the dude is built like a brick house. Not saying burn a 1st or 2nd rounder on him, but if he's there in R4-R5 we'd be wise to get him. He does it all...slot stuff, jet sweep, KR/PR...definitely young Cobb vibes.
But unfortunately Gurt has "size requirements" he isn't particularly flexible on.
Darren Sproles is the best example of this type of player (5'6" 190) and he went in the 4th round.
But unfortunately Gurt has "size requirements" he isn't particularly flexible on.
We did however draft a guy named Amari Rodgers , maybe this is the real guy he was looking for all along.
@Fandame posted:From Bill Huber, showing how much Rodgers doesn't trust/trusts his young WRs:
"From 2008 through 2021, the first 14 seasons of Aaron Rodgers’ run as the starting quarterback, the #Packers got 13 touchdown receptions from their rookie receivers. Watson (seven), Doubs (three) and Toure (one) have 11."This year Rodgers has no choice but to use the young guys because Watkins does nothing more than use oxygen on the field; Cobb has been hurt; Lazard has been only okay and is not a #1 or #2; Tonyan...hard to tell if his number hasn't been called much or he isn't open. Jones has been reliable, but he's still an RB. If Watson hadn't come on, this offense might as well be three yards and a cloud of turf.
"Lazard has been only okay and is not a #1 or #2". I know Lazard does not get a lot of love on X4 but I like him . Alot ! He is also , I have read, but ya'll know me, having a break out season.
@MichiganPacker posted:Darren Sproles is the best example of this type of player (5'6" 190) and he went in the 4th round.
I say get him in the 3rd round and break our jinx.
@The Grinder posted:"Lazard has been only okay and is not a #1 or #2". I know Lazard does not get a lot of love on X4 but I like him . Alot ! He is also , I have read, but ya'll know me, having a break out season.
All he does is catch first downs.
@GBFanForLife posted:Tonyan should have requested a faster acl.
I’d go taller over faster.
@The Grinder posted:"Lazard has been only okay and is not a #1 or #2". I know Lazard does not get a lot of love on X4 but I like him . Alot ! He is also , I have read, but ya'll know me, having a break out season.
I like him too. Still not a #1 WR. I hope we keep him next year though. Great complement to Doubs and Watson and a Rodgers who quits pouting that he has to throw to rookies.
Lizard doesn't get much (any?) love from the media and a fair amount of fans. My take has always been that the Packers are a much better team with him than not.
I daresay he is the best-blocking WR in the league, he's strong as an ox, and (most importantly) he's a playmaker. In my mind, he reminds me of Micah Hyde; their measurables and speed may not be at an elite level, but their ball-hawking abilities sure are.
When Lazard came out some thought he would be a good TE. Of course he isn’t but he sometimes does fill that role with his blocking. He is not to be overlooked by a defense because he can catch contested balls as well as block. Watson may be tall and can block but his biggest threat is his speed.
I would not describe Lazard as a playmaker (always thought those were guys who could take it the distance once the ball is in their hands), but he is a solid #3 WR.
@FLPACKER posted:I would not describe Lazard as a playmaker (always thought those were guys who could take it the distance once the ball is in their hands), but he is a solid #3 WR.
What I made clear as mud was that Lazard is not a #1, but he's a doggone excellent #3 and the team is a lot better with him on it than not. He sets the standard for blocking and he's clutch for third downs, but he's not a consistent gamebreaker.
@Fandame posted:What I made clear as mud was that Lazard is not a #1, but he's a doggone excellent #3 and the team is a lot better with him on it than not. He sets the standard for blocking and he's clutch for third downs, but he's not a consistent gamebreaker.
I feel like Lazard is a 2B # 2 rec and/or a 1A # 3 rec. Vital. Did that make sense?
