Skip to main content

@Boris posted:

Has the list come out yet??

I think everyone knows it will have powerful humans on it including politicians and the current King I believe (former Prince)

Isn't there a better place to discuss this than x4?

There has to be ONE website/app somewhere to discuss this.....has to be.....

(Goes thru alphabet .....)

Hah! Look the letter "X" I found it!!!!

x.com

Please try there. Thank you

I've got an easier solution Boss, just lock this sucker up.  1st Covid, now Epstein, with Rodgers opening his big yapper it will soon be something else.   No matter how much you tell some (you know who you are)  they will still push the envelope.   Yep, lock it up.

I wanted Rodgers gone before start of 2022. I'm sad that it didn't happen then. Oh well....can't change it....move forward. I'm happy where my favorite team currently is. Let's keep improving and win #14!!

Jimmy Kimmel should sue Rodgers now. What a stupid and reckless thing for Rodgers to say when he mentioned Kimmel and Epstein’s list.  Rodgers doesn’t know when to keep his mouth shut because he needs attention.

People complain about Steven A Smith, Cowherd, Bayliss and all the rest of the worthless talking heads.  But McAfee  is worse than all of them. Do the others pay out millions to get sports stars to go on their shows? I've never heard that they do.  He is nothing but a wanabee.   I can honestly say I have not watched 1 minute of his show and I doubt I ever will.

Last edited by ammo

Ammo, so you pass judgement on Macaffee as the worse when you have never watched 1 minute of his show. Well, I am glad at least you have arrived at your opinion thru your personal observations.

Seriously, I usually only watched it when AR was on. I enjoyed watching that uncensorred part of AR. As far as Macafee, his schtick gets a little old but he is not as bad as Bayless and others.  At least Mcafee recognizes greatness whereas Bayless is a total hack who elevates and denigrates a player by his whims and whatever can get him a view. Two complete opposites. While Macafee has an acquired taste, (similar to how Jim Rome was in the day) at least I feel is comments are genuine.

Last edited by Floridarob
@titmfatied posted:

LOL, yet Bayless says we when referring to the Cowboys makes him an authority on when to say we or not.  Rodgers just spent 15 years in Green Bay. Getting the we out of him while talking about the Packers might take a little while. Suck it Skippy!!!

@Floridarob posted:

Ammo, so you pass judgement on Macaffee as the worse when you have never watched 1 minute of his show. Well, I am glad at least you have arrived at your opinion thru your personal observations.



I said i have never watched 1 minute if his show. I have seen enough snippets on ESPN and other sites to know what a hack he is.   Anybody who has to pay Rodgers 7 figures to come on his show to generate viewership can't be worth a tinkers damn.  Live or die on your own talents.

I don't think that's how it happened. Rodgers was on before the whole thing blew up. From what I understand McAfee is a guy who spread the wealth once it started coming in. His regular guys that have been with him since the start have been very well taken care of since he hit the algorithm Jack pot. I'm not a fan of the yelling schtick, either .

I think I watched almost every Aaron Rodgers Tuesday when he was still a Packer. Maybe 1/4 of them since. If I see a clip that looks interesting I'll check it out. But I can't imagine watching his show every day. What is it, like 3 hours? I don't know how people do that.

@Packy posted:

Jimmy Kimmel should sue Rodgers now. What a stupid and reckless thing for Rodgers to say when he mentioned Kimmel and Epstein’s list.  Rodgers doesn’t know when to keep his mouth shut because he needs attention.

Does Rodgers sue him for suggesting he had a brain injury 9 months ago?  Or does it only work in one direction?

When a guy can't be bothered to put on a shirt with sleeves to do a national TV show, I can't bother watching him. Christ, do these guys not market themselves to clothing companies?

That's a sorry way to judge a show, I suppose, but I doubt there's much difference at the core between his shows and the others I also don't watch.

@BrainDed posted:

Does Rodgers sue him for suggesting he had a brain injury 9 months ago?  Or does it only work in one direction?

Ever heard the phrase, apples and oranges?  That would apply here.  Both have made joking comments in the past but Rodgers’ comment regarding Epstein and Kimmel went too far over the line.  McAfee apologized to Kimmel.  Hopefully, Rodgers does also.  If not, well I guess we already know what kind of person Rodgers is.

Last edited by Packy

We've all been or seen arguments where one person steps passed that line and that's what happened here.  Rodgers absolutely had the right to go after Kimmel. He could have went after him a hundred different ways.  But alluding to him being a proven pedophile is not defensible.

If Rodgers was a decent person, he'd just say he made a mistake.  That he was trying to give Kimmel some s**t after the comments on his show and thought he was being clever with the release of the Epstein documents.  He didn't think of the consequences and regrets his comments and that he'll do whatever he can to help move past this.  Guess we'll see what happens Tuesday. 

You guys are not taking into consideration that the reason Kimmel joked about a brain injury is because Rodgers believed an Epstein list existed and expressed interest in seeing it.

Rodgers joke was a continuation, and validation now, of that topic.

But the guy kicks kids with cancer in the balls so fuck him, right.   I remember when the media would attack him with BS like this and y’all defended.   Now he isn’t on your tribe so the media is right.  

@Timmy! posted:

When a guy can't be bothered to put on a shirt with sleeves to do a national TV show, I can't bother watching him. Christ, do these guys not market themselves to clothing companies?

That's a sorry way to judge a show, I suppose, but I doubt there's much difference at the core between his shows and the others I also don't watch.

I do not think that You or I are his targeted audience. I get tired of the F bombs every other sentence but again, I don't think he cares what I think. Similar to my wife thinking she needs to tell the Chef at a great restaurant what he needs to do to make a great dish taste better. I just roll my eyes. (when she isn't looking)

@ammo posted:

Will the Jets look into Rodgers appearing on McAfee?   Time will tell.

https://www.audacy.com/wfan/sp...ers-for-comments?utm

Not specific to Rodgers in this case, but I've always wondered where the line was where a team can or the league can prevent a player from endorsing products or making paid appearances.

I'm more curious about situations where a guy whose team has been eliminated from the playoffs appears on a studio show later in the playoffs. Do those guys get paid also? The winning players on a Super Bowl team each get an extra 150K. But if a player (let's say Tom Brady or Drew Brees) is on a team that gets eliminated earlier and gets paid 100K every time they do a studio spot, doesn't it stand to reason you are setting up an incentive that they could make more money by sitting in a comfortable studio relative to playing in Buffalo or Green Bay in January?

I'm just guessing that the NFL isn't going to touch this Rodgers-McAfee situation if they don't have to. Unless Rodgers goes on there and questions something about the integrity of the game or slandering another NFL player (like saying officials are getting bribed or that some other player is on steroids), I think they'll stay out of it. If they do get involved, could they then use the same logic to prevent a player from endorsing a product or organization they don't like?

i hope Rodgers stays on Macafee. He was a better Qb than Kimmel was ever a comedian. And where else would I learn the Super Bowl Logo colors are the exact colors of the teams that are going to meet in the Super Bowl. Thanks Aaron.

Make fun of a guys baldness, his looks, his political beliefs, basically anything is OK in my book, but there is a line.   Go over it and you better be able to back it up. Alluding to a guy being a pedo without a shred of evidence is just plain wrong.  All he has to do is say I’m sorry , I thought my comments would be taken as a joke, I was wrong, again, I apologize.  

The ball is in AR’s court.  He needs to clean this up.  

@Floridarob posted:

Ammo, so you pass judgement on Macaffee as the worse when you have never watched 1 minute of his show. Well, I am glad at least you have arrived at your opinion thru your personal observations.

Seriously, I usually only watched it when AR was on. I enjoyed watching that uncensorred part of AR. As far as Macafee, his schtick gets a little old but he is not as bad as Bayless and others.  At least Mcafee recognizes greatness whereas Bayless is a total hack who elevates and denigrates a player by his whims and whatever can get him a view. Two complete opposites. While Macafee has an acquired taste, (similar to how Jim Rome was in the day) at least I feel is comments are genuine.

I agree on Mcafee and I can't watch all the time because his Bro persona at times is a  bit much for me but at the same time I do like him.  IMHO I think his schtick works for the group of fans that are sick of the Cowturds, Bayless, and Screamin A's of the world.   

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×