Skip to main content

IMHO, what sealed the deal for Jones coming back was the INT Tolzien threw, where White stopped running on the route. Imagine that AR saw that & I imagine that as a result he would never even look in White's direction in a real game. 

Originally Posted by heyward:

       

Yes, I have to admit I'm obsessed. There's something very alluring about a person who can always manage to be wrong about everything. 


       
That is apparently the case. Keep the strong contributions to X4 coming, brilliant as always.
Originally Posted by FLPACKER:

IMHO, what sealed the deal for Jones coming back was the INT Tolzien threw, where White stopped running on the route.

White is and always has been a marginal player. Rather than any one play, I trace it back to the failure of Boykin to develop as anticipated. I believe the organization viewed him as the replacement to JJ and obviously it didn't work out.

Jones caught 14 TD's in 2012 when some other guys were injured, does not have a major injury history himself, and is not all that old for a WR (31).  They are very fortunate to get him back in my opinion.

Most common criticisms of this signing:

 

Jones is too slow: Well Jones was never a speed guy, so it's not like he's going to lose it over night.  He was a bigger guy who ran good routes and had great hands (outside of some very, poorly timed concentration lapses).  

 

His stats were awful, especially YPC: Ummmm, he was playing for the f**king Raiders!  That offense had no talent on it.  Seriously, look it up.  No talent at RB, WR and a rookie QB (2nd round, no less).  Jones should never have been the best player on the offense.  In GB, he won't.  

 

If two terrible teams cut him, he must suck:  The Raiders/Giants cutting him, doesn't affect his worth.  Those two teams are rebuilding and have no shot at a championship.  What's the point in have a 31 year old #3 WR on your roster when can get young guys more playing time?  

 

So yeah, I think it's a good signing.  James Jones for $10m over 3 years made no sense last year, but James Jones at the minimum with Jordy out makes a ton of sense.  Montgomery, Janis and White aren't ready for full time duty; too many holes in their game.  Jones just gives them a reliable target.  And if he has lost it, he'll be gone and TT will only be out the veteran minimum.  

Last edited by CUPackFan

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

Originally Posted by MEl-Ka-Bong:
Originally Posted by BILL H:

it would be a shame if they let a productive,young player go 

 

Or if they let Myles White go

Swing and a miss. Better off with the ceiling argument.  Production was there. White's #'s this pre-season: 16catches/157yds/2tds.

 

You can argue that was with scrubs playing.  But it was scrubs that he beat, with backup QB's throwing to him.

White doesn't have much of a ceiling other than #4-5 WR. Again, it took him 3 years to make the team and that was because of an injury. If Jordy never gets hurt, White is cut(he's not eligible for the PS) and nobody would have said a thing

 

I feel for the guy because he kept at it and then finally made the roster only to get cut a day later, but the NFL is a tough business. JJ has more talent than White. GB improved their roster with this move and that's all I care about

 

Now, if only they could finally get an ILB that can move in space and cover...

Last edited by CAPackfan
Originally Posted by phaedrus:

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

So it's 4 WR's, 3 TE's, and a OSPR (old slow possession receiver) you have to change the scheme for to get him the ball.  Why not just use the Tight End.

Last edited by Pistol GB
Originally Posted by Trophies:
Miles White is bottom of the roster. Jones steps in as the #3WR. I don't see what all the fuss is about. This really is Aaron Rodgers' call. Who can argue that?

1. "Steps in as the #3"? Really?  I thought he was depth.  If that is true, then ouch.  Really would rather have Montgomery and Janis than Jones as the #3.  At least they can get open and run after the catch,

 

2. Fuss? It's cut-down time, what else is there talk about? 

 

3. Aaron Rodgers made the call?  Where are you getting that?

Tough break for white, but Green Bay needs a contributor in 6 days. if any up the top 3 remaining relievers was lost for even a game it would have destroyed half the playbook. Jones is a threat for a play or two every game.
Jones can beat man coverage by his strength alone, never big for YAC.
If jones or any WR is sucky, they can cut ties with jones and activate Abby.
My god..  I've never seen so much angst over a player with such a limited skill set.

Pistol, unless Myles White is your son, give it up.
Last edited by Boris
Originally Posted by Boris:
My god..  I've never seen so much angst over a player with such a limited skill set.

Pistol, unless Myles White is your son, give it up.

Dude.  I'm going to have an opinion.  Deal with it or boot me.

 

Just because you disagree doesn't make it angst.

Last edited by Pistol GB

I want Charles Johnson back.

 

Strange though, if they value White more than Abby (by having him on the 53 and Abby to PS) won't they cut Abby now and put White on PS?  Hope not, but wouldn't that be logical given their thinking?

Originally Posted by Boris:

       
My god..  I've never seen so much angst over a player with such a limited skill set.

Pistol, unless Myles White is your son, give it up.

       
Obviously you were on vacation for the great debate about Jumal Rolle last year?
Last edited by YooperPackfan
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Originally Posted by heyward:

       

Yes, I have to admit I'm obsessed. There's something very alluring about a person who can always manage to be wrong about everything. 


       
That is apparently the case. Keep the strong contributions to X4 coming, brilliant as always.

That's the only thing you ever wrote that made sense. 

Last edited by heyward
Originally Posted by GreenBayLA:

If Jones can be solid #3 it's a good pick up. "Rent a vet for one year" tells me TT knows the window for 2nd Super Bowl won't stay open forever and he is willing to take action. Good sign. 

My thoughts as well.

Originally Posted by Pistol GB:
Originally Posted by phaedrus:

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

So it's 4 WR's, 3 TE's, and a OSPR (old slow possession receiver) you have to change the scheme for to get him the ball.  Why not just use the Tight End.

 

80 some catches last year as the only legit target and a crap qb.  He can get open.

 

That vs a guy who couldn't crack the roster in 3 years of trying.  The young WR's that actually have talent are still with us.

 

This a no brainer.

Last edited by BrainDed
Originally Posted by Hud:

       
I want Charles Johnson back.

Strange though, if they value White more than Abby (by having him on the 53 and Abby to PS) won't they cut Abby now and put White on PS?  Hope not, but wouldn't that be logical given their thinking?

       
He will never make it through wavers to sign to the practice squad, because according Pistol we just cut the next Jerry Rice
Last edited by YooperPackfan
Originally Posted by YooperPackfan:
 
   
He will never make it through wavers to sign to the practice squad, because according Pistol we just cut the next Jerry Rice

That is EXACTLY what I said!

 

EDIT for the reading comprehension impaired: no it isn't

Last edited by Pistol GB
Originally Posted by BrainDed:
Originally Posted by Pistol GB:
Originally Posted by phaedrus:

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

So it's 4 WR's, 3 TE's, and a OSPR (old slow possession receiver) you have to change the scheme for to get him the ball.  Why not just use the Tight End.

 

80 some catches last year as the only legit target and a crap qb.  He can get open.

 

That vs a guy who couldn't crack the roster in 3 years of trying.  The young WR's that actually have talent are still with us.

 

This a no brainer.

Well hell yeah if you think James Jones is going to turn into Anquan Bolden,  it's a no-brainer alright.

Last edited by Pistol GB
Originally Posted by Pistol GB:

       
Originally Posted by BrainDed:
Originally Posted by Pistol GB:
Originally Posted by phaedrus:

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

So it's 4 WR's, 3 TE's, and a OSPR (old slow possession receiver) you have to change the scheme for to get him the ball.  Why not just use the Tight End.

 

80 some catches last year as the only legit target and a crap qb.  He can get open.

 

That vs a guy who couldn't crack the roster in 3 years of trying.  The young WR's that actually have talent are still with us.

 

This a no brainer.

Well hell yeah if you think James Jones is going to turn into Anquan Bolden,  it's a no-brainer alright.


       
That is EXACTLY what he said
Originally Posted by Hud:

Strange though, if they value White more than Abby (by having him on the 53 and Abby to PS) won't they cut Abby now and put White on PS?  Hope not, but wouldn't that be logical given their thinking?

They valued White's ability to contribute at the present time and with Abby it's about the upside.

Originally Posted by Pistol GB:
Originally Posted by phaedrus:

If the Packer's scheme allows for the same way Bolden could get so open, JJ should be able to fit that position type.  Big guy.  Good hands (except, as mentioned, the early history of lack of concentration dropsies).  Strong.

So it's 4 WR's, 3 TE's, and a OSPR (old slow possession receiver) you have to change the scheme for to get him the ball.  Why not just use the Tight End.

Because Jones will be fulfilling the TE roll in certain sets as well.  Tell me, how is that scheme going to change if it's White, who wouldn't see the field as anything but a #4, or Jones, a player who has already played the #3 in this offense?

 

****ing hilarious.  If MM thought White could play at #3 or even #4 this year he'd be on the roster.  He isn't.  

Last edited by Henry
Originally Posted by YooperPackfan:

80 some catches last year as the only legit target and a crap qb.  He can get open.

 

That vs a guy who couldn't crack the roster in 3 years of trying.  The young WR's that actually have talent are still with us.

 

This a no brainer.

Well hell yeah if you think James Jones is going to turn into Anquan Bolden,  it's a no-brainer alright.


       
That is EXACTLY what he said

Bolden was the one with 80+ catches last year (+1,000+ yards to Jones 600), not Jones.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×