Skip to main content

The thought of a 2 TE set with Bennett and Cook would be pretty interesting. More efficient, better ball control offense certainly helps a defense. Maybe that's what McCarthy has told him- the defense can be developed slower if we can have more ball control on offense. 

 "The Black Unicorn" is a quirky dude- but you didn't hear a word about that in New England last year. But when he was in Chicago? He's funny. A very entertaining and funny guy. But over time it did kind of get to the point of "shut up and play". If he doesn't get the ball you can bet he'll talk to the media about it. And if there are any internal issues on this team he'll air it out publicly to the chagrin of the brass. 

Last edited by Music City

I get the sense that Bennett is a guy who is hilarious and fun when things are going well and pain in the a$$ when they aren't. He says whatever he wants, whenever he wants, so it will be interesting to see how that works in GB where everyone seems to be a little more conscious of the things they say. They would have signed him if they thought it was a problem though.

A little bit of light shined on the way the Packers do business:

"The Packers, we’re told, made it clear to Bennett that they are loyal to the players who played for them, and they were candid about the intense effort invested in trying to get a deal done with Cook. That loyalty actually had a positive impact on Bennett, even though it delayed the team’s effort to pursue him β€” and potentially would have made an arrangement between Bennett and the Packers moot."

http://profootballtalk.nbcspor...n-martellus-bennett/

Obviously it's unconfirmed at this point, but that does seem to be TT's MO. It also says it's actually a flat 3 years, 21 million with no fluff. 

Packdog posted:

Think about this - The Bears had Martellus Bennett, Alshon Jeffrey, Brandon Marshall, and Matt Forte.....and still SUCKED. 

Hmm - who was that QB again?  You need that guy to make an offense effective.  Plus Brandon Marshall has so many lose screws a few fall out every year - not to mention he is what his initials says he is - a BM.  

I like the Bennett deal.  Quality player and a contract that will be pretty easy for the Packers to get out of after one year if necessary.

All sorts of different information floating around about the contract but it looks like it's a 3 year, 21 million dollar deal.  6.3 million dollar signing bonus.  Yearly cap numbers are 3.85 million, 8.55 million, 8.6 million.  Surprising to see a jump to an 8+ million dollar cap number in year two but if an injury happens the Packers can cut him and would only have to eat 4.2 million.  Very "team-structured" IMO.

I'm not sure if I prefer Bennett or Cook?  Cook seemed like a pretty good fit here.  They are nearly the same age.  Bennett has only missed 5 games in the last 4 years and Cook has only missed 6 games over that same timeframe.  Over the last 3 years Cook has averaged 12.33 yards per catch and Bennett has averaged 10.38 yards per catch.  I do think Cook is a better down-the-field threat.  But Bennett would be a better red-zone target which is pretty significant.  Pro Football Focus had them right next to each other in their 2016 tight end rankings.  Pro Football Focus did have Cook graded as a much better run blocker but I'm not sure how much that plays into the equation as the Packers really don't seem to value the blocking ability of the tight ends at the top of the depth chart.  It will be interesting to see what kind of contract Cook gets.  To me it's a toss up and I'm happy that Thompson went out and addressed the position because (1) Richard Rodgers isn't starter quality in this league (2) the Packers could not afford to use two draft picks on tight ends.

Really like this signing. Kendricks caught 50 passes for a 10 yd. avg. with the woeful Rams last season. Ted and M.M. making sure that if our #1 TE goes down for any length of time again this season the cupboard won't be completely bare. (Seems to happen a lot for some reason.)  Our O is a lot more potent when we have a legitimate TE target In the mix. Bennett and Kendricks could make for some interesting 2 TE sets.

 Now go get Barwin to replace Peppers/Jones and provide flexibility for moving Clay inside & out.

Last edited by Maxi54

Glad their finally addressing depth at TE rather than waste time with guys like Perillo and Backman. Those guys are good ST players, but there's no comparison between where our depth was at 3 days ago and where it is now. 

I've said from the beginning, Ted is does not dislike UFA's he just won't compromise on value. He won't overpay for someone he thinks may not be worth it in the long run. Also FAs have to have mutual interest. 

Jordy. Cobb. Adams. Allison. Davis. Bennett. Kendricks. Ty Montgomery in the backfield. Aaron Rodgers. Geezus.

Draft loaded at RB. OLB. CB. 

Still a load of talent in FA that's already getting cheaper. Morris Claiborne. Zach Brown. Kevin Minter. Conner Barwin. DJ Fluker. Bennie Logan. 

Things are shaping up nicely  

 

Last edited by ChilliJon

Just read that Sidney Jones, CB, who was a consensus 1st round pick this year just tore his Achilles during Washington's Pro Day. Witnesses say it was a significant injury. Jones was picked to go to the Packers with their 29th pick in the 1st round by several mock drafts. How will this affect TT's draft? Will he have to move up to nab a CB or will there still be quality people available at 29?

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×