Skip to main content

I find it surprising that this deal is not done yet.  Packers and Jets had to have had an outline of compensation before they gave Jets permission.  The only holdup would have to be AR himself?

If I understand things, in order to get any cap relief for this year, trade would have to be post June 1, which means no draft picks this year?  Is this correct?

@vitaflo posted:

So let me get this straight.  The Jets are willing to give us a 1st and a 3rd plus a player and take on a 40 year old Rodgers and his ridiculous contract,  but they aren't willing to give the Ravens two 1sts and pay a 26 year old Jackson a ridiculous contract?  Because they're worried about Zach Wilson?

Right now it doesn't look like anybody wants to give up two 1's and a ridiculous contract for Jackson. 

@H5 posted:

I don't recall any serious comments for AR to be traded going into '18 or '19. Some rumblings during the '19 season, but again not really serious.

My comment wasn’t about trades or picks. It was in ref to Goalline’s comment about β€œa year too late”. Basically, the Packers are trading him a year too late. Unless, of course, last year was an anomaly (for a variety reasons) and he’s back to MVP form in 2023.

Last edited by PackLandVA

I would be really hesitant with burning valuable draft picks for Jackson and also having to pay him huge money.  For me as PackerRick stated I would worry a lot about his playing style.  You can only get by being a running QB in the NFL only for so long.  And I may be in the minority but when I see him play I think he is a awesome as a runner but I just don't know if you had to rely upon his passing if he can win really big.

@DH13 posted:

Right now it doesn't look like anybody wants to give up two 1's and a ridiculous contract for Jackson.

Because players of his skillset don't last all that long in the league. You could give up the two picks, and lock into a huge contract...and then he blows his ACL. Yeah any player runs that risk, but LJ is more of a risk because so much of his game is pull it and run it. His skillset also doesn't fit in particularly well with what Hackett likes to do. 12 is a better fit at NYJ right now.

Also I think a lot of LJ's value is overhyped by the media...he is a media darling. The opposite of 12. With LJ, you have to really build the whole offense around him. He is far more valuable to Baltimore than to any other franchise.

Last edited by Chongo

In case anybody wondered why Richard Sherman isn't a GM, now you know. Jackson is nowhere close to being in Burrows class as a QB. Burrows immediately turned that franchise around. One QB threw for 9000 yards and 69 TDs the last two seasons. The other had 5000 yards and 33 TD. I'm thinking Sherman would need two guesses to pick out which QB put up the numbers. Forget the running unless this guy wants to be the next RG3.

Some people are saying Green Bay wants the farm for Rodgers. Other people saying it won’t cost that much and GB just wants to move on…

The reality is Aaron Rodgers, even pushing 40, is worth at least a 1st round pick coming off 2 of the last 3 MVPs... and that 3rd season was with a banged up thumb.

Sam Bradford was traded for a 1st round pick. Carson Wentz for premium picks...twice!

I think 12 is likely to go for more than we think, rather than less.



If I'm the Jets, I'd want a 2 yr (minimum) commitment. Gutekunst very likely told Rodgers (back during the season exit interviews) what GB expects.

So, here we are. AR trying to decide if he wants to commit, for either team... or retire.

Rodgers is basically under contract for 2 more years so if the Jets make the trade that's about as much commitment as they'll get. Even Rodgers doesn't know how he'll feel about playing until after the 2023 season. About the only way to make a fair deal is to give the Packers a guaranteed pick in 23 and a conditional pick(s) in 24 if Rodgers plays a 2nd season.

@H5 posted:

Some people are saying Green Bay wants the farm for Rodgers. Other people saying it won’t cost that much and GB just wants to move on…

The reality is Aaron Rodgers, even pushing 40, is worth at least a 1st round pick coming off 2 of the last 3 MVPs... and that 3rd season was with a banged up thumb.

Sam Bradford was traded for a 1st round pick. Carson Wentz for premium picks...twice!

I think 12 is likely to go for more than we think, rather than less.

The problem isn't Rodgers, it's his age and contract.  None of these other examples people keep talking about were trading a 40 year old QB due to make $60m next year.  That's the difference.

Last edited by vitaflo

There is also a big difference in the resumes of those QBs and Rodgers. I think they were both the #1 pick of the draft yet they were moved shortly into their careers. Guys like that don't get traded unless their original team is highly motivated. $60 mil is a problem but for the Jets it's only as a cap hit, Woody has the coin. I would assume part of the conversation with Rodgers included renegotiating into a cap friendly deal. I believe Rodgers said he was open to that no matter where he plays in 2023.

Looks weird in that shade of green. While of course it's possible Rodgers could retire, I really don't think it gets this far if there was any real possibility he does.

I think the only hang up is Rodgers committing to 2 years vs 1.

Last edited by packerboi
@vitaflo posted:

So, based on this, deal is all done.  Just (still) waiting on Rodgers to shit or get off the pot.



A couple of weeks under ground and he will be closer to making a decision .

Trading for Lamar has a few issues - injuries, declining play since his MVP year, and his insistence on a fully guaranteed contract.  Plus, he doesn't have an agent to talk any sense into him on the guaranteed contract.  If he couldn't come to a deal with the Ravens the last 2 years, what other team is going to come to a deal AND give up 2 first rounders?  The Lamar thing is very complex, and it's tough to compare to Rodgers. 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×