For Rodgers to get back into good graces (just "on the field stuff")
He needs to
A) throw more interceptions
2) throw to weaker receivers and stop prioritizing productive receives
iii- Take more sacks.
I think these are manageable
For Rodgers to get back into good graces (just "on the field stuff")
He needs to
A) throw more interceptions
2) throw to weaker receivers and stop prioritizing productive receives
iii- Take more sacks.
I think these are manageable
Nope ...just throwing to who is open would be my lone wish.
Pull his head out of his ass.
@FLPACKER posted:Nope ...just throwing to who is open would be my lone wish.
Sure, he even acknowledged he should have thrown to Lazard. But armchair qbs think a guy sees every player the moment they are open even when playing an entire game behind a shit line.
I wouldnβt hope AR play better in the big game too, but the level of absurd is becoming ridiculous.
GOATS donβt get a lot of slack
You are obviously clinically insane and a danger to society.
Imagine if he just took more risks with the ball
Suppose, just suppose, Adams was gone? Or maybe we had a couple of legit #2 receivers? Would Aaron take more risks and throw to someone else? Heck, he wanted to keep WWJ and if all he needs is someone else to get open then he might not be fixated on one WR and take a few risks.
There is always a WR open, this ain't McCarthy's offense.
It was during the 9ers game, which I'd blame more on injuries than anything. Mentioned several times the lack of motion.
No question that a healthy Bakh and Jenkins playing, it's likely a very different game.
Or Yosh Nijman.
Or WWJ.
Or Bart Starr.
Or LeRoy Jenkins.
@Herschel posted:Taking a look at that last play, San Fran's defense dictated what turned out to be a lousy play call.
1. Both outside corners blitzed. The LCB was picked up by Jones, the only other non-JAG receiver on the field besides Adams.
2. The RCB delayed, mucking up Lewis' release.
3. Lazard's route put him right in two linebackers' zone drops.
4. They dropped to single-high, and both outside receivers ran in-breaking posts to the safety, essentially giving double coverage to two receivers with three defenders.
Setting aside the OTs not holding up, best theory for routes from what we saw were:
A: Adams deep post. If safeties don't drop, or drop to a Cover-2 (most likely from formation), he beats his man as primary, adjusting route to coverage. ESB may be in position to block, but he's near last in the reads.
B: Jones running an out pattern. Adams clears behind him, with Lazard coming across, hoping to pull Jones' man up. Instead he got stuck picking up the corner blitz, taken out of play.
C: Lewis delayed release to the hook/curl/short area Lazard cleared or linebacker bit on his block "fake", but then had to account for delayed RCB blitz. He was the safety valve, essentially taken out of play.
D: Lazard clears left side shallow and hopefully crossing and drawing right side shallow. He also can turn upfield to block if Jones comes back in.
E: ESB clears left side deep. He can block if Adams gets free, as well, but he's the #4 or #5 read.
Best guess is first three reads were neutralized with no crease for Adams, no route at all for Jones and no safety valve in Lewis. It doesn't help when the Packers don't have a third viable option who can outrun San Fran's linebackers.
Iβm more of a visual learner. A sketch would have been nice.
World of Warcraft thank you very much.
At least he's got chicken.
Packers fans, what do you make of this? pic.twitter.com/U4SpGCHXJ1
β IKE Packers Podcast (@IKE_Packers) February 22, 2022
Packers fans trying to figure out Aaron Rodgers Instagram post: pic.twitter.com/VFamD1wtIZ
β Danny Armstrong (@DArmstrong44) February 22, 2022
+ = Twitter Writings
@H5 posted:Packers fans, what do you make of this? pic.twitter.com/U4SpGCHXJ1
β IKE Packers Podcast (@IKE_Packers) February 22, 2022
smells a lot like regret to me
More speculation oh goody.
Just announce your decision already so we can move on.
Something has to happen within the next couple of weeks??
He enjoys the attention his cryptic messages provide.
@michiganjoe posted:He enjoys the attention his cryptic messages provide.
Yup.
For F*** sakes, just make your decision.
β David Bakhtiari (@DavidBakhtiari) February 22, 2022
Sounds like he's dying. Is it too late to trade him?
I mean, is it possible heβs retiring? Prior to the tweet I wouldnβt have thought so but WTH that reads in a way like heβs preparing to hang it up.
Pretty much kills any trade value as well. Who wants someone whoβs not all in.
Denver is probably shitting themselves right now.
They are basically pulling a Miami Heat trying to clear a path for Giannis and not only did he return but Milwaukee won the title but not before sweeping the Heat first.
I'd like all of you to take a step back and read it like a guy going through one of the standard toxic positivity stages of "gratefulness".
It could be his way of saying goodbye to Hackett. It could be his way of "gratefull"ing his way out of a break up. He is a human after all.
So what should Packers fans think of this? Clickbait for the assholes asking "what to Packers fans think of this?".
So what should Packers fans think of this? Who gives a fuck.
I donβt know Hank. If I post something like that publicly people will either do a suicide check or say Iβm being a drama queen.
After all of the public scrutiny this year why post something like this that you KNOW people are going to run with and freak out a out. Unless thatβs your plan in the first place in which case you are a jackass, a drama queen, or both.
I will never, never understand social media and why people use it.
Everything he says and does is well crafted and calculated and delivered. This isnβt some THC fueled stream of consciousness posted on social media.
He absolutely knows what he is doing.
In the end, dude plays football. Heβs an amazing QB. But hell yes heβs also high maintenance and a drama queen. Not unlike some other pro athletes that are elite.