Skip to main content

@FLPACKER posted:

Nope ...just throwing to who is open would be my lone wish.

Sure, he even acknowledged he should have thrown to Lazard.  But armchair qbs think a guy sees every player the moment they are open even when playing an entire game behind a shit line.  

I wouldn’t hope AR play better in the big game too, but the level of absurd is becoming ridiculous.  

@Herschel posted:

Taking a look at that last play, San Fran's defense dictated what turned out to be a lousy play call.

1. Both outside corners blitzed. The LCB was picked up by Jones, the only other non-JAG receiver on the field besides Adams.

2. The RCB delayed, mucking up Lewis' release.

3. Lazard's route put him right in two linebackers' zone drops.

4. They dropped to single-high, and both outside receivers ran in-breaking posts to the safety, essentially giving double coverage to two receivers with three defenders.

Setting aside the OTs not holding up, best theory for routes from what we saw were:

A: Adams deep post.  If safeties don't drop, or drop to a Cover-2 (most likely from formation), he beats his man as primary, adjusting route to coverage. ESB may be in position to block, but he's near last in the reads.

B: Jones running an out pattern. Adams clears behind him, with Lazard coming across, hoping to pull Jones' man up. Instead he got stuck picking up the corner blitz, taken out of play.

C: Lewis delayed release to the hook/curl/short area Lazard cleared or linebacker bit on his block "fake", but then had to account for delayed RCB blitz. He was the safety valve, essentially taken out of play.

D: Lazard clears left side shallow and hopefully crossing and drawing right side shallow. He also can turn upfield to block if Jones comes back in.

E: ESB clears left side deep. He can block if Adams gets free, as well, but he's the #4 or #5 read.

Best guess is first three reads were neutralized with no crease for Adams, no route at all for Jones and no safety valve in Lewis. It doesn't help when the Packers don't have a third viable option who can outrun San Fran's linebackers.

I’m more of a visual learner. A sketch would have been nice.

I'd like all of you to take a step back and read it like a guy going through one of the standard toxic positivity stages of "gratefulness".

It could be his way of saying goodbye to Hackett.  It could be his way of "gratefull"ing his way out of a break up.  He is a human after all.

So what should Packers fans think of this?  Clickbait for the assholes asking "what to Packers fans think of this?".

So what should Packers fans think of this?  Who gives a fuck. 

Last edited by Henry

I don’t know Hank. If I post something like that publicly people will either do a suicide check or say I’m being a drama queen.

After all of the public scrutiny this year why post something like this that you KNOW people are going to run with and freak out a out. Unless that’s your plan in the first place in which case you are a jackass, a drama queen, or both.

Everything he says and does is well crafted and calculated and delivered.  This isn’t some THC fueled stream of consciousness posted on social media.    

He absolutely knows what he is doing.  

In the end, dude plays football.  He’s an amazing QB.  But hell yes he’s also high maintenance and a drama queen.  Not unlike some other pro athletes that are elite.  

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×