Skip to main content

I believe the Packers are currently sitting at #3 in opponent's points per game (18 ppg) -- behind Buffalo and NE.

Without Jaire for most of the season and without Z for all but a few plays,

Wow.

They still play 2 bad offenses (Detroit and Chicago), a mediocre offense (depending upon who is healthy) in Cleveland and have 4 games against good offenses (Minnesota twice, the Rams, and Ravens).

The big additions have obviously been Stokes and Campbell but this is truly a complete turnaround on the defensive side of the ball.

They have not finished in the top 10 in scoring defense since ... 2010.

Everybody is playing faster.  It's almost like they aren't over thinking assignments or covering for weak spots. 

Honestly, I feel like a Bears fan watching a real QB.  I'm not sure just how good Campbell is because we haven't had a bench mark for over a decade.

I'm sure scheme is part of it but this defense really does play aggressive.

@Henry posted:

Everybody is playing faster.  It's almost like they aren't over thinking assignments or covering for weak spots.

Honestly, I feel like a Bears fan watching a real QB.  I'm not sure just how good Campbell is because we haven't had a bench mark for over a decade.

I'm sure scheme is part of it but this defense really does play aggressive.

This. So much this.

Throws are made and I expect guys to be open by 5 yards and instead a Packer is draped all over the receiver.

That may have occurred against Trubisky or other trash QBs in the past but against the likes of Murray, Mahomes, and (an admittedly rusty) Wilson? 

If it was just Stokes, and I really do think Stokes has been special, it could be chalked up to personnel but by God even King has been more aggressive and not to mention Savage and Amos.

The way the D is playing, giving up under 16 ppg since the opener against the Saints, is just hard to process as a Packer fan.

Sort of like how Bears' fans who watched the 4th quarter of the Monday night game against Pittsburgh with Fields making plays like a bona fide NFL QB must have felt.

What I love about this defense is there are so fewer blown assignments. Good example was the attempted flea flicker screen and Campbell smells it out early and drops the rb for a 6 yard loss.. Lowrey and even Lancaster clogging things up and we actually have a couple of ILBs that can clean up. Also, finally a secondary that can run!

I remember a story about Barry when he showed a tackle form in the meeting room and actually fell to the floor doing it. It’s was funny but it also showed how dedicated he is to it. It has been showing up on the field. He lets linebackers be linebackers and the team has the players to execute it. Also I must give kudos to Jerry Grey for getting his players to play well on the backend. I believe that he is DC material and we are lucky to have him.

Kirksey was Pettine's hand-picked ILB.

Barnes is nothing more than a competent backup...if they'd actually spend a top pick on an ILB like Roquan Smiff or Patrick Queen they'd be even better.

The reason Campbell is doing so well this year is largely because the Packers are doing something they haven't done in a long time...get consistent pressure with only four DL/OLB. Pettine and Compers couldn't do that with any sort of regularity.

I shit on the Double L's a lot, but they've both stepped up their game this season. And Slaton I think is also underrated...much like college, he was known for his run D, but his interior pass rush is something we haven't had in a while.

@BrainDed posted:

What Barry has that the 2 past DCs didn’t is a talented middle at every level.   Savage, Amos and Clark were there for Pettine but Savage and Clark are improved with experience.   Campbell has been a huge improvement over Kirksey, Martinez and whatever turds were before the,  

Yeah, I have zero problems with Pettine.  If he played cautious it's because he was playing with absolute shit at ILB.  With the Ravens and Jets that was Rexy ball's bread and butter.

Pettine's defensive rankings were pretty damn impressive considering.  Compare that to The Wizard (yes, he gets the same acknowledgement of shit talent) and the Packers defense was just shit across the board.

Last edited by Henry
@Henry posted:

Yeah, I have zero problems with Pettine.  If he played cautious it's because he was playing with absolute shit at ILB.  With the Ravens and Jets that was Rexy ball's bread and butter.

Pettine's defensive rankings were pretty damn impressive considering.  Compare that to The Wizard (yes, he gets the same acknowledgement of shit talent) and the Packers defense was just shit across the board.

Agree.  So far the ranking goes Barry > Pettine > Capers.

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×