Skip to main content

When I saw MM not take a timeout with :54 left and using :20 more for the next play, I knew he was going for OT.  And I knew it was lost right there.  I was not at all excited to go to OT.  I even paused the DVR and saw a friend off who was in town for the weekend.  We spent a good half hour saying goodbyes before I went back to the TV to get it over with.  No, I didn't think AR would even see the field.

As we all were, I was hoping to see how McCarthy would play offensively once we got the ball in overtime. I think it would have been similar to how he played the 2nd half against Dallas; open up the passing, Cobb in the backfield, strike them over the middle, set up the run with the pass and run Eddie after we've softened them up with passes... very little of which we saw in the 2nd half of this game. It appears McCarthy has to be desperate to play to our strength.

****. This is what I was afraid of. Lotta green there.

Here's a screen shot of the INT by Burnett, courtesy of @

 

EDIT:

From the end-zone angle:

 

Last edited by ilcuqui

It's just sad. You have to continue playing. It's not like there was 2:00 left. There was still 5:00 LEFT! As soon as he went down, I was screaming at the TV. KEEP PLAYING! At worst we need to come out with 3 from that INT.

 

It's just sad.....another blown opportunity with a VERY healthy team that had no excuse to lose & found one anyway. Congrats! Way to invent new ways to lose

http://www.packersnews.com/sto...rrect-play/22031847/

 

There's a defense of the play, which I disagree with completely. The "logic" they used would apply in the first quarter as well and doesn't really make any sense. Time left has to be a primary consideration and they just ignore it.

Originally Posted by Hungry5:

Chilli - my point was that McCarthy changed who they were. Sure the book says to do what he did, but that is not who they are. Muscle memory... 

 

Final drive for the FG to tie the game they went back to who they are. Everyone and their brother knew they were going to have to move the ball for at least the FG, and SEA couldn't stop that.

 

 

Not only that, but early on, with 4th & goal at the one, after the stupidity that was the Kuhn run, don't kick it, play to win, drive it home and score 6. MM coached scared the whole damned game.

Just think if he would have waved his way thru traffic after Peppers made the first block and he scored a TD.....chances were about the same as fumbling. At the time I must admit thatI thought going down was correct, that was without seeing the clear path ahead of him.. Stevie Wonder in a wheel chair could have matriculated down the field for 20 yds.

Bottom line...

 

They played not to lose, instead of playing to win.

 

In the end, all you did was prevent the win. It's just sad to flush such a golden opportunity down the toilet.

Originally Posted by michiganjoe:

There's apparently an end zone shot out there that's even more depressing. That one's really inexplicable.

Just added it to my post above with the original side angle picture.

 

https://packers.timesfour.com/t...6#434210043791528696

 

If Peppers blocks the lineman behind him instead of signalling, looks like Wilson is the only guy with a legitimate shot to tackle Burnett.

 

 

Last edited by ilcuqui
Originally Posted by Hud:
Originally Posted by slowmo:
Originally Posted by Hud:
Originally Posted by slowmo:
Originally Posted by Hud:
Originally Posted by DH13:

I think there are extremes where a team lines up with their best "block" play in place and where their best "prevent fake" play is in place.  The real failure of that play was Slocum (I assume) not just abandoning all efforts for a block, conceding the 3 and guarding full balls vs the fake.  In a tight game like that, 3 doesn't do much for you but 7 can be a turning point.

 

  

.

 

Not having an owner to hold people accountable may be the reason we've had 2 Super Bowl wins with 20 years of Hall of Fame quarterbacking. 

Wow.  Do us a favor, list the franchises where the owner who "held people accountable" suddenly morphed a highly talented team but under acheiving team into a Super Bowl winner. 

You got me, I can't. You're right, owners don't matter. Now you do us a favor and tell us why, after years of epic playoff failures, where teams and players set records against our D, and where Sunday the Packers D gave up 21 points in less than 5 minutes because Dom Capers couldn't get off the field on a 1st and 30, and rushed two on 2nd and 19 and had Hawk on the field in the most important drive of the year allowing Lynch to go by him untouched, and played no deep safety in overtime... why is Dom Capers still the defensive coordinator for this team?

Because MM won't fire him. 

That's avoiding the question. I'll rephrase... should he be the defensive coordinator going forward?

No, he shouldn't.  But, unless MM fires him, he will be.

Originally Posted by Fedya:
Teams with owners holding people "accountable":

San Francisco
Chicago
Denver

I'd throw Minnesota in, but I think the Wilfs simply have no idea what they're doing.

SF no, that was just York/Baalke ego not co-existing with Harbaugh ego. They were looking to unload him as early as last spring.

Originally Posted by Hungry5:

Chilli - my point was that McCarthy changed who they were. Sure the book says to do what he did, but that is not who they are. Muscle memory... 

Except Rodgers wasn't Rodgers.  He was hobbled to the point of missing dump-off throws and if he had to run, to hopping on 1 foot. 

 

That had to factor in there.

Taking chances when you have to is the issue.

 

IMO, Rodgers is healthy and you want a first down to run out the clock, Rodgers rolls out and either dumps it off or runs it himself.  That safe option is gone.

 

Obviously it's easy to second guess now.  It failed.

Everyone is pissed. When there's no rational explanation for losing that game then dammit someone needs to lose their damn job. Someone has to pay and they have to pay right now. 

 

This is how fans justify crap losses like this one. I get it.

 

Now isn't the time to talk about firings and public lynchings. That time will come. When it does Slocum and Zook can pack their **** up and beat it. 

Originally Posted by GBFanForLife:

The part that pissed me off is the idiots celebrating on the sideline celebrating like the game was over. I yelled at the TV that there were 5 minutes left. (they didn't hear me)

And Seattle's bench was spiking its collective helmet, and tens of thousands of fans are pouring out of the stadium in disgust, and NONE of them were wrong:  barring a miraculous and astronomically improbable set of events, the game was over.

Last edited by Pistol GB
Originally Posted by cuqui:
Originally Posted by Fedya:
Teams with owners holding people "accountable":

San Francisco
Chicago
Denver

I'd throw Minnesota in, but I think the Wilfs simply have no idea what they're doing.

SF no, that was just York/Baalke ego not co-existing with Harbaugh ego. They were looking to unload him as early as last spring.

SF, that is about to unravel.  If you want to hear the ultimate inarticulate coach, just watch this interview.   http://thebiglead.com/2015/01/...-his-interview-game/

Chicago--holding Lovie "accountable" for not making the Super Bowl turned out swell for them, didn't it?

 

And Denver.  Again, another team that went all in and failed.  Could see them not even making the playoffs next year, and that's with a healthy Manning.

quote:
SF no, that was just York/Baalke ego not co-existing with Harbaugh ego.
They're holding the wrong people accountable.  That's a way meddling owners can screw things up.

Along the same lines, Woody Johnson really screwed up the GM situation with the Jets two years ago, and look where that got the franchise.
Originally Posted by Pistol GB:
Originally Posted by GBFanForLife:

The part that pissed me off is the idiots celebrating on the sideline celebrating like the game was over. I yelled at the TV that there were 5 minutes left. (they didn't hear me)

And Seattle's bench was spiking its collective helmet, and tens of thousands of fans are pouring out of the stadium in disgust, and NONE of them were wrong:  barring a miraculous and astronomically improbable set of events, the game was over.

And what does that tell you? It tells you that I was right and they were Rong!

Originally Posted by CAPackFan95:

If Burnett doesn't score, it's quite likely WORST case, he's inside Seattle's 30.

 

I think he scores though. 

Yep. Worst case scenario is they are in FG range, likely expand the lead to 22-7. Unbelievable decision by Burnett to just slide there

Originally Posted by cuqui:
If Peppers blocks the lineman behind him instead of signalling, looks like Wilson is the only guy with a legitimate shot to tackle Burnett. 

That's how I see it as well. My guess is Mike Daniels would take care of Wilson.

Originally Posted by Goalline:

YOU GUYS ARE MASOCHISTS!

I feel like I am relatively fine with everything. Then I pop on here and see how it could have easily been and was just thinking that this is not the best way to keep my mind on productive things.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×