Skip to main content

@PackerHawk posted:

The dumbass in the first video called 21-0 before the PAT. Casual!!

That second video is really disturbing and brings back bad memories of one of the Bills' games I've been to. Older guy sitting a couple of seats to the side of me, with 2 adult sons, is totally wasted before game even starts and pukes all over himself and the ground between us. I spent the whole game twisted to the far side of my seat with my legs to the far side as well.  They never removed him until the 4th quarter,  his sons just let him sit there basically passed out.

I mean, Detroit has a pretty good overall roster and are winning despite having a meathead as head coach.  I would think they will continue to be decent but hey, itโ€™s Detroit we are talking about.  

Minnesota has a lot of holes to fill and who knows what they do at the QB position?

Iโ€™m not sold on Chicago one bit and Caleb Williams isnโ€™t going to play there.

Then thereโ€™s GB.  If Love is the guy long term they can literally go into the draft next year with a bunch of draft capital and make what is a good team into a great team by just hitting on a few of their choices.  

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl...er/s1_17068_39998527

im not interested in Stefan Diggs.  And I donโ€™t understand the narrative that โ€œthe Packers need a veteran receiver.โ€  This young receiving core was schemed open and put up more tdโ€™s than all other teams.  And thatโ€™s after a rough first half of the season.  There seems to be an unselfishness about the group of wideouts and tight ends.  I want to let them grow and see no need for a โ€œveteran receiver.โ€  

https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl...er/s1_17068_39998527

im not interested in Stefan Diggs.  And I donโ€™t understand the narrative that โ€œthe Packers need a veteran receiver.โ€  This young receiving core was schemed open and put up more tdโ€™s than all other teams.  And thatโ€™s after a rough first half of the season.  There seems to be an unselfishness about the group of wideouts and tight ends.  I want to let them grow and see no need for a โ€œveteran receiver.โ€  

GB now has veteran receivers. They've been together for an entire year, they work together in the offseason, and they support each other like no other WR group in the league. They act like seasoned veterans. It would be difficult to find a WR room more professional than this one. Don't mess with success.

A key element to that is the fact they were all drafted at the same time, or at least within a year.  I would assume most players with seniority feel they are the defacto leaders of a group, and maybe Watson and Doubs are, but it's not like you have a 6 or 8 year vet, or even a year 4 or 5 guy who is angling for more $.  They're all in the same boat.

It also helps everyone in the room stay fully invested because they all feel they have nearly equal opportunity for seeing the ball come their way.  The #4 or #5 guy on the depth chart (if that even applies in their case) won't be half assing routes because he knows he won't see the ball.  He could be the leading receiver in the game!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×