Skip to main content

Z Smith, even if only playing 20ish snaps a game could be a big difference. Playing him in the middle and disrupting the interior with KC & Lowry could be significant.

3rd down w/Jaire and Z back





Also, consider what SFO did yesterday.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

The above does not appear to bode well for our Packers. Yet, was the past decade just large swing of the pendulum, and could it head back the other way?



Been digging through the archives. This is from just before SB 45. GBs D had been playing really well that season. 2010 - GB won 2 games in the same season while scoring 10 or less points. Yet, as pointed out, 3 of previous 4 Owl winners were bottom half in scoring D. 13th scoring D (2021 rank) may not be the sign many of us think.





Attachments

Images (3)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1
  • mceclip2

Jimmy G had a QB rating of 57.1 to Rodgers 91.9. That's a nearly 35 point difference between the 2. At one point, Garropollo's rating was 10 for much of the first half.

And yet the Packers lost. I'd love to see the stats of where your team's QB is 35 points better than his opposing QB and still manages to lose. I can't imagine it happens all that often.

@packerboi posted:

Jimmy G had a QB rating of 57.1 to Rodgers 91.9. That's a nearly 35 point difference between the 2. At one point, Garropollo's rating was 10 for much of the first half.

And yet the Packers lost. I'd love to see the stats of where your team's QB is 35 points better than his opposing QB and still manages to lose. I can't imagine it happens all that often.

Them winning the turnover battle trumps the difference in QB rating.

These locker room quotes aren’t great!

There scheme employed by Barry fits a defense that is lacking talent. The basic premise of it is "we are going to play 2 deep safeties, a lot of zone defense, not give up the big play, and hope that one or more things happen: 1) You aren't patient enough to take the short and intermediate plays we give you 2) You incur a major penalty 3) On third down ...a) We make an outstanding play b) You make a poor play such as a dropped pass 4) We stop you in the red zone and you have to a FG. So in other words we are going to try to make you beat yourself. This defense has the talent to take more chances , dictate, especially in the past two weeks when we've faced a depleted offense. This is why Belichek has been the best ....he is not afraid to change the entire scheme every week, rather than just say "this is what we do".

After a night of sleep, I woke up with a great bit of clarity...

With regard to Barry's D...the time for fuck-fuck is over. Fix this shit now, and if the Bills humiliate us, your ass is gone. Never a fan of mid-season changes...they are usually knee-jerk and largely ineffective. But it's obvious by players comments, they don't have faith in the man...and even more obvious by their performances.

Yeah, the offense has it's own turd bucket to carry, but the defense is supposed to be the strength of the team...and right now they are equally as bad as the O.

Not arguing against replacing Barry sooner rather than later, but one reason against doing so now is that it could make it more difficult to replace him with a quality DC.  What potential candidate will want to go to GB after they fired their previous DC barely into his second season?  And the defense was solid last season.

A better option might be for MLF to take a more active role in his defense.  We all know that AR runs the offense anyway….(half kidding).

Agree, he isn't going to fire Barry. Seems like it is more the play calls, which is correctable. Herman had a good observation on one of Jones' QB draws. Packers were showing double A gap blitz, would have negated the draw, however, the Giants appeared to know it was a "bluff", and when the 2 LBers sprinted back and out on the snap, Jones ran it.

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×