Skip to main content

@Fedya posted:

I thought Rodgers' contract restructuring made it highly likely that he's going to be playing for GB in 2022?

Nope. 2022 is now an albatross. He counts $46 million vs the 2022 cap and the Packers are already way over that cap with almost all of their WR's and Tonyan not under contract.

His contract is basically play out 2021 then decide if you want to stay or go. If he stays they need to come up with a new contract into his 40's.   

@PackerHawk posted:

Nope. 2022 is now an albatross. He counts $46 million vs the 2022 cap and the Packers are already way over that cap with almost all of their WR's and Tonyan not under contract.

His contract is basically play out 2021 then decide if you want to stay or go. If he stays they need to come up with a new contract into his 40's.   

Z. Smith also counts 28 million against the cap in 2022 (and has "only" a 12 million dead cap hit if they cut him).

P. Smith counts 20 million (with a 7 million dead cap hit).

Cobb counts almost 10 million (with a 3 million dead cap hit).

Amos is 12 million (and 4 million dead cap hit).

Rodgers is 46 million (but "only" 26 million in dead cap).

If you add Bakh's 23 million cap charge (he's 40 million to cut next year) and K. Clarks (21 million vs. 15 to cut) , the Packers are on the hook for about 160 million in cap charges just 7 guys). If they move on from both Smiths, Cobb, Amos, and Rodgers they are looking at saving about 74 million in cap charges (but getting stuck with 52 million in dead cap charges).

The plan all along was just to expect 2022 to be a transition year. They have 254 million in cap charges right now without factoring in any money for D. Adams or the next draft class. The cap is set for 208 million. They are going to have to find a way to cut 50 million from the cap charges. Some of that might be waiting until after July 1 and splitting the dead cap hits over 2 years. Doing that with Rodgers gets them 2/3rds of the way there in 2022 (13 million dead cap in 2022 and 2023 vs. a 46 million cap hit in 2022.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/gr...ay-packers/cap/2022/

Z. Smith also counts 28 million against the cap in 2022 (and has "only" a 12 million dead cap hit if they cut him).

P. Smith counts 20 million (with a 7 million dead cap hit).

Cobb counts almost 10 million (with a 3 million dead cap hit).

Amos is 12 million (and 4 million dead cap hit).

Rodgers is 46 million (but "only" 26 million in dead cap).

If you add Bakh's 23 million cap charge (he's 40 million to cut next year) and K. Clarks (21 million vs. 15 to cut) , the Packers are on the hook for about 160 million in cap charges just 7 guys). If they move on from both Smiths, Cobb, Amos, and Rodgers they are looking at saving about 74 million in cap charges (but getting stuck with 52 million in dead cap charges).

The plan all along was just to expect 2022 to be a transition year. They have 254 million in cap charges right now without factoring in any money for D. Adams or the next draft class. The cap is set for 208 million. They are going to have to find a way to cut 50 million from the cap charges. Some of that might be waiting until after July 1 and splitting the dead cap hits over 2 years. Doing that with Rodgers gets them 2/3rds of the way there in 2022 (13 million dead cap in 2022 and 2023 vs. a 46 million cap hit in 2022.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/gr...ay-packers/cap/2022/

Yikes!! So we are basically approaching cap hell and will be losing a bunch of our best players?

The high round turd swap.  Seems to be a theme.  I'm not complaining.  Trying to see if your collective turds benefit from a change of scenery and scheme first before getting ganked off the roster is worth it.

Considering the amount of slot CBs that are supposedly needed for this D, Yiadom sounds like a somewhat better fit than Jackson.

I thought Jackson’s skills would translate better than they did.  Teams figured him out pretty quickly that he couldn’t simply sit back or play off of or against NFL quality receivers and make plays.  Margin for error is much less.

Change the scenery and see where it goes.  The new guy would be hard pressed to look or play worse than JJ.

The only hope I have is maybe the Packers will pick up some salary cap pocket change from this deal.
I'm glad Jackson is gone. Saturday night, I saw him as a player that just didn't care. Very similar to HHCD's last year or two in Green Bay.
A guy can be a bad player, he might struggle, or he can get toasted by an opponent time and again, but when he looks like he's not even trying... f 'em.

Solid trade. I liked Yiadom coming out as a press corner and a likely solid special teamer. His issues in zone weren’t exactly a secret and it’s a cheap dart to throw. Meanwhile Jackson’s issues in man weren’t a surprise either and yet he also sucked in zone as well as offering bupkis on special teams. Well worth a shot.

Last edited by Herschel

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×