Skip to main content

@Herschel posted:

People like to point to Mamula, but the combine is still important in evaluation. The shorter interviews kind of suck, but the medicals are invaluable and the drills do provide a direct comparison of guys ranked similarly and can help confirm what teams already think or call attention to take a second look at a guy they maybe had kind of written off. It also lets teams see what the guy is like around a "new team" rather than the college teammates they were so familiar with.

The drills are more informative to "us" in most cases, of course, since we're not on campus practice visits and can only watch so much available video. The draftnik boards will change a fair amount but the team boards very little.

For every Mike Mamula there are 10 guys who were superb college players but not athletic enough for the NFL. Must evaluate both aspects of a player’s ability.

Re evaluating my TE evaluations ..

Musgrave & Kuntz - showed up in the 40, 10 yard split, vertical, and Broad jump. Musgrave could sneak into the First Round , Kuntz would be a good pick in the 4th or 5th round

Washington -- ran better (4.65) than expected and could also get into the First Round

LaPorta - up - ran better than expected but not as big as some of the others , 3rd or 4th round?

Mayer -not First round worthy , ran a 4.72,

Strange & Whyte - not as fast as I thought

Last edited by FLPACKER
@Chongo posted:

This draft is LOADED at TE prospects...with all our picks, if we don't hit on at least one not sure we ever will. No need to go TE in R1...there will be several in R2 and R3 worth taking IMO.

But more times than not there is a real difference between a 3rd or 2nd rounder TE vs a first rounder. I say swing for the fences on your first real weakness/need. If its TE then so be it. We can then continue to draft like a science the rest of the draft. Do the research , interviews and trust your scouts.

@Satori posted:

71,000 college football players nets only ~ 260 that get drafted each spring.
Its absolutely insane how elite an NFL athlete is compared to most college dudes

Add to the fact there were some elite high school players who never played college ball and it shows you how unlikely making an NFL roster is. It’s like winning the lottery.

@FLPACKER posted:

Re evaluating my TE evaluations ..

Musgrave & Kuntz - showed up in the 40, 10 yard split, vertical, and Broad jump. Musgrave could sneak into the First Round , Kuntz would be a good pick in the 4th or 5th round

Washington -- ran better (4.65) than expected and could also get into the First Round

LaPorta - up - ran better than expected but not as big as some of the others , 3rd or 4th round?

Mayer -not First round worthy , ran a 4.72,

Strange & Whyte - not as fast as I thought

For a TE with size, below 4.7 is still pretty decent, but yeah, Musgrave was the only top guy to match Kelce's 40, and only Kuntz and Mallory his Kittle's marks and faster than Tonyan pre-knee.

Last edited by Herschel

One of the guys covering combine for NFL Network has picked up on the "below 4.7 forty" as a benchmark for elite TEs in the league. I think he said that the average 40 time for the top 10 TEs (yards gained this past season) is 4.62? I've been beating that horse since we had Jared Cook.... almost every all-pro TE in the last 30 years has been a sub 4.70. ...Kittle, Kelcie, Antonio Gates, Gronk, Graham, Hernandez, Witten, Gonzalez, Sharpe ...  etc.

To me, I’m not sure what you can take from 40 times.  

I mean, how many times do you see a player line up and run in a straight line unopposed and in shorts?  

Jermichael Finley was clocked at a 4.82 40. Next to Keith Jackson, I’d say Finley was probably the most athletic TE I’ve seen in GB in my lifetime.   Maybe Jared Cook gets an honorable mention.

Guys climb up or drop down in the draft for a number of really stupid reasons.   The size and speed measurables might be the most overrated factors in draft analysis.  I mean, I get it you can’t be 5’4” and play QB.  Or run a 5.25 40 and play WR.   But if the draft has taught us anything it’s that truly elite players don’t become those players without working their asses off both physically and mentally.   Hard work and desire and toughness are undefeated.   No truly great athlete will excel at the top of the food chain exclusively based on their ability alone.  

From Tony Pauline @ PFN: NFL Combine Takeaways From Day 5

Darnell Washington, TE | Georgia

Darnell Washington was much faster than anyone expected and tested incredibly well. He measured 6’7’’ and 264 pounds, with arms a tad under 34.5 inches and hands 11 inches large.

His forty timed 4.64 seconds with an equally swift ten split of 1.57 seconds and Washington touched 10’2’’ in the broad jump. He caught the ball exceptionally well, easily moved about the field, and played to his forty times. Washington is about to watch his draft stock take off and has cemented himself as a second-round pick.

Zach Kuntz, TE | Old Dominion

Zach Kuntz, who saw his senior season come to a premature end after five games with an injury, had a Combine workout to remember. His testing numbers were outstanding for a tight end who measured 6’7’’ and 255 pounds.

Kuntz’s forty clocked 4.55 seconds, he touched 40 inches in the vertical jump, and his broad jump reached 10’8’’. Kuntz caught the ball extremely well and often outran passes being delivered by the quarterbacks. Prior to his injury, scouts graded Kuntz as a middle-round prospect, and this workout will revive that conversation.



Also a rundown on LaPorta at the link.

I didn't know Kuntz was also 6'-7". And he ran a 4.55!?

@Tschmack posted:

To me, I’m not sure what you can take from 40 times.  

I mean, how many times do you see a player line up and run in a straight line unopposed and in shorts?  

Jermichael Finley was clocked at a 4.82 40. Next to Keith Jackson, I’d say Finley was probably the most athletic TE I’ve seen in GB in my lifetime.   Maybe Jared Cook gets an honorable mention.

Guys climb up or drop down in the draft for a number of really stupid reasons.   The size and speed measurables might be the most overrated factors in draft analysis.  I mean, I get it you can’t be 5’4” and play QB.  Or run a 5.25 40 and play WR.   But if the draft has taught us anything it’s that truly elite players don’t become those players without working their asses off both physically and mentally.   Hard work and desire and toughness are undefeated.   No truly great athlete will excel at the top of the food chain exclusively based on their ability alone.  

I agree. I'd rather see more emphasis placed on burst than raw speed. It's the first step or two or three or the ability to cut and burst or outjump someone that really helps separate guys. Defensive players are always reacting, so having the ability to react with a strong burst of speed and strength is essential. On offense, a TE or WR needs that burst to get immediate separation. Without that immediate separation, it takes a bit for a fast WR to get downfield and hopefully get open and that puts a lot of pressure on the OL. Look at Tonyan; everyone said he was a step or two slower this year, but something else that was evident was how his burst to get open was gone. That's one of the hardest things to come back from when it's an ACL.

@DH13 posted:

From Tony Pauline @ PFN: NFL Combine Takeaways From Day 5

Darnell Washington, TE | Georgia

Darnell Washington was much faster than anyone expected and tested incredibly well. He measured 6’7’’ and 264 pounds, with arms a tad under 34.5 inches and hands 11 inches large.

His forty timed 4.64 seconds with an equally swift ten split of 1.57 seconds and Washington touched 10’2’’ in the broad jump. He caught the ball exceptionally well, easily moved about the field, and played to his forty times. Washington is about to watch his draft stock take off and has cemented himself as a second-round pick.

Zach Kuntz, TE | Old Dominion

Zach Kuntz, who saw his senior season come to a premature end after five games with an injury, had a Combine workout to remember. His testing numbers were outstanding for a tight end who measured 6’7’’ and 255 pounds.

Kuntz’s forty clocked 4.55 seconds, he touched 40 inches in the vertical jump, and his broad jump reached 10’8’’. Kuntz caught the ball extremely well and often outran passes being delivered by the quarterbacks. Prior to his injury, scouts graded Kuntz as a middle-round prospect, and this workout will revive that conversation.



Also a rundown on LaPorta at the link.

I didn't know Kuntz was also 6'-7". And he ran a 4.55!?

Washington and Kuntz are the same kind of TE...Packers could make a case to take one of them, and a more athletic Kittle-like guy also. MLF offense needs more capable TE.

IMO

@Tschmack posted:

To me, I’m not sure what you can take from 40 times.  



It's essentially how fast a person can cover 40 yards on foot, usually measured in seconds.  You can take that information and determine which person could cover that distance fastest to the person who covered that distance most slowly. 

@Chongo posted:

Washington and Kuntz are the same kind of TE...Packers could make a case to take one of them, and a more athletic Kittle-like guy also. MLF offense needs more capable TE.

IMO

The first "ability" attribute people brought up about DW after the 2022 season was that he was a 6th OL.  I don't know how good of a blocker Kuntz is but that may separate the two prospects.  6'-7" running 4.55 sounds like Jared Cook but I have not seen a lick of Kuntz's tape.

@DH13 posted:

The first "ability" attribute people brought up about DW after the 2022 season was that he was a 6th OL.  I don't know how good of a blocker Kuntz is but that may separate the two prospects.  6'-7" running 4.55 sounds like Jared Cook but I have not seen a lick of Kuntz's tape.

I watched Kuntz on TV today and he did look the part. We would do well  with him if DW was gone. Some reason though I have my heart set on DW. Even if we kept Lewis one more year.Which I also hope.

Last edited by The Grinder
@The Grinder posted:

I watched Kuntz on TV today and he did look the part. We would do well  with him if DW was gone. Some reason though I have my heart set on DW. Even if we kept Lewis one more year.Which I also hope.

Only question with him is that he played vs. a lower level of competition. He started at Penn St. but didn't stick there, I am sure reasons for that will be explored.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×