@Satori posted:The reason you can't get past it is because you don't fully understand it yet.
Let me see if I can shine some illumination on the deal. It was specifically designed to be a placeholder and to insure the Packers couldn't trade him without his consent. That was the main goal of that deal and both Rodgers and the Packers front office were fully aware there was zero chance he'd play on that contract in GB or elsewhere in 2023, 2024 and beyond. No chanceRodgers has talked openly about the need to re-do the deal. Gute has talked openly about the need to re-do the deal. Andrew Brandt wrote an article and talked about how the deal would be re-done no matter what. Everybody who matters understands why the Packers agreed to that contract.
The media numbnuts either don't know or most likely don't care. Wilfull ignorance works in their favor and they can keep pouring even more gas on the "Rodgers is holding the Packers hostage" fire. Its incredibly stupid
Don't let them lead you into stupidity. Stop thinking the FO effed up.
They didn't.100 % guarantee that Rodgers will re-do his deal ( especially the option bonus) if he returns to the NFL this year. He'll either help GB or help GB and their trade partners.
The deal was still poorly done by the FO considering the cap implications.