quote:Originally posted by JJSD:
Brett Favre, of course.
your rite, how could eye be such a maroon.
quote:Originally posted by JJSD:
Brett Favre, of course.
quote:Originally posted by JJSD:
Brett Favre, of course.
quote:Originally posted by TravisLL:
quote:
Favre rebuffs Vikings, will stay retired
By Rick Schwartz
The Minnesota Vikings will not sign free-agent quarterback Brett Favre(notes), a source close to the team told Yahoo! Sports on Thursday.
The source said Favre told Vikings coach Brad Childress that he wanted to remain retired in a phone call that took place sometime in the last day. Favre is expected to publicly explain his decision soon.
quote:Originally posted by who:
But it was all Favre, we're now learning.
quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:
I guess if we've learned anything the past couple of days it's that Favre had nothing to do with winning the Super Bowl.
quote:Originally posted by Hungry5:
I'll believe this latest when Sagvarus Rosenson starts that first game.
quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:
Man if this really the case, how hilarious. How many hours were spent talking about this on talk radio? How many ESPN segments were done about this? Look at how long this thread has gotten?
However, I guess if we've learned anything the past couple of days it's that Favre had nothing to do with winning the Super Bowl. That was something I wasn't aware of.
quote:Originally posted by Max:quote:Originally posted by who:
But it was all Favre, we're now learning.quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:
I guess if we've learned anything the past couple of days it's that Favre had nothing to do with winning the Super Bowl.
See, this is what makes discussion difficult here sometimes.
quote:Originally posted by who:
I didn't say he had nothing to do with the Super Bowl win. I was addressing the notion that it was all Favre. As the record shows quite clearly, that wasn't the case.
quote:Originally posted by Max:quote:Originally posted by who:
But it was all Favre, we're now learning.quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:
I guess if we've learned anything the past couple of days it's that Favre had nothing to do with winning the Super Bowl.
See, this is what makes discussion difficult here sometimes.
quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:quote:Originally posted by who:
I didn't say he had nothing to do with the Super Bowl win. I was addressing the notion that it was all Favre. As the record shows quite clearly, that wasn't the case.
Who, who said I was commenting on who's post?
quote:Originally posted by chickenboy:
However, I guess if we've learned anything the past couple of days it's that Favre had nothing to do with winning the Super Bowl. That was something I wasn't aware of.
quote:Originally posted by CAPackFan95: You know what I've learned, that Henry is a wise wise man.
quote:Originally posted by Blueshound:
Of course he is rebuffing.... it's OTA season pert ner'. Give it a few months. "MARK IT DOWN" & "TRUST ME"....
quote:Originally posted by heyward:
A lot of interest in a guy who hasn't been all that relevant ON the football field this decade.
quote:Originally posted by Blueshound:
Of course he is rebuffing.... it's OTA season pert ner'. Give it a few months. "MARK IT DOWN" & "TRUST ME"....
quote:Originally posted by Ed Vedder:
The divorce last year was ugly, but since his time with the Jets I haven’t seen a single thing coming from him that warrants all this hate.
quote:Originally posted by Packy:
What? Maybe no TOG for the Vikes!!!
The Queen fans must be sick that the savior might not come now....
quote:Originally posted by bdplant:quote:Originally posted by Ed Vedder:
The divorce last year was ugly, but since his time with the Jets I haven’t seen a single thing coming from him that warrants all this hate.
TOG spills the beans to Millen because he can't stand the fact that the Packers have moved on without him.